By continuing to browse our site, you are consenting to the use of cookies.
Click here for more information on the cookies we use. Hide

Quick Links


Publication Date
07 August 2014
Case Reference
Track 2
Adjudicated Party
Service Type
Tribunal's final assessment
Very Serious
Code 12 para 4.8.2d - Fine
Code 12 para 4.8.2b - Formal reprimand and/or warning
Code 12 para 4.8.2a - Remedy the breach
Code 12 para 4.8.2i - General refunds
Breaches raised
Code 12 2.3.3 Fairness
Code 12 2.3.11 Fairness
Code 12 2.3.8 Fairness
Code 12 2.3.12 (c) i Fairness
Code 12 2.4.2 Privacy
Code 12 4.2.4 Investigations

Between 29 May 2013 and 5 June 2014, PhonepayPlus received 216 complaints from consumers in relation to a virtual text chat service` (the “Service”), which operated under the brand names, “Fonegirls”, “VirtualTxtBabes” and “Naughtywap”. The Service was operated by the Level 2 provider WAP Network Group Limited (the “Level 2 provider”) on the premium rate shortcodes 69034, 69035, 69061, 69062, 69744 and 89150. Promotional material for the Service stated that consumers were charged either 25p or 50p per SMS message sent and £1.50 per SMS message received. The Level 1 provider for the Service is IMImobile Europe Limited (the “Level 1 provider”). The Level 2 provider advised the Executive that the Service had operated in its current format since October 2012 but information from the Level 1 provider revealed that the Service had been operational since September 2011. The Service was operational but the Level 2 provider stated on 15 July 2014 that it was no longer promoting the Service.

The Service was promoted on banner advertisements on a number of adult mobile websites. Consumers sent their postcode to a Service shortcode to be matched with a virtual profile and upon receipt of an age verification message, consumers were required to send a mobile originating message (“MO”) to opt-in to the Service..

Click here to view the Adjudication decision