Gico Europe LLP
Publication date | 21 August 2013 |
---|---|
Case reference | 28785 |
Procedure | Emergency Procedure |
Adjudicated party | Gico Europe LLP |
Service type | Competition - non-scratchcard |
Tribunal's final assessment | Very Serious |
Sanctions |
Code 12 -
4.8.2 (b) Formal reprimand and/or warning Code 12 - 4.8.2 (d) Fine Code 12 - 4.8.2 (i) General refunds |
Summary | The Level 2 provider, GICO (Europe) LLP, operated an online subscription competition quiz service using the brand name “Triviato”. The Service was operated on the premium rate shortcode 80876 at a cost £4.50 per week. The Level 1 providers for the Service were MC Mobile Connectivity GmbH and Velti DR Limited. The Service offered consumers the opportunity to participate in monthly quiz competitions. Consumers were required to answer ten questions. The person who answered the most questions in the fastest time every month won a prize, such as a Shell giftcard. The Service operated from September 2012 to 2 July 2013 (when it was suspended as a result of the use of the Emergency procedure). The Executive raised the following potential breaches of the PhonepayPlus Code of Practice (12th Edition) (the “Code”) • Rule 2.3.1 - Fair and equitable treatment The Tribunal upheld all breaches raised save for the alleged breach of paragraph 3.4.12(a). The Level 2 provider’s revenue in relation to the Services was within the range of Band 5 (£5,000-£50,000). The Tribunal considered the case to be very serious and issued a formal reprimand, a fine of £27,000, a warning that if the Level 2 provider fails to ensure that it has sufficient measures in place to prevent actual or potential consumer harm being caused by affiliate marketing in future it should expect to receive a significant penalty for any similar breach and a requirement that the Level 2 provider refund all consumers who claim a refund, for the full amount spent by them on the Service, within 28 days of their claim, save where there is good cause to believe that such claims are not valid, and provide evidence to PhonepayPlus that such refunds have been made. |
Download adjudication decision |