Cellso Ltd
Publication date | 17 March 2016 |
---|---|
Case reference | 71959 |
Procedure | Track 2 |
Adjudicated party | Cellso Ltd |
Service type | Video |
Sanctions | |
Breaches raised |
Code 12 -
2.3.4 Fairness |
Summary | Between 9 February 2015 and 22 January 2016, the Executive received 158 complaints concerning a glamour video subscription service, charged at £3 per week, operating on dedicated shortcode 80027, and shared shortcodes 66033, 88150, and 82999 (the “Service”). The Level 2 provider for the Service was Cellso Limited (the “Level 2 provider”). The Level 1 provider for Service shortcode 66033 was Zamano Solutions Limited. The Level 1 provider for Service shortcode 80027 was Fonix Mobile Limited. The Level 1 provider for Service shortcodes 82999 and 88150 was Veoo Ltd. After analysing complainant message logs, the Executive noted that there was a high failure rate of chargeable messages following the purported consumer opt-ins, and the delivery status of Service messages was unclear. The Executive raised the following potential breach of the PhonepayPlus Code of Practice (the "Code"):
The Tribunal, having considered all the evidence, did not uphold the alleged breach, for the reasons given in the adjudication. |
Download adjudication decision |