We are the UK regulator for content, goods and services charged to a phone bill.

DSLB Ltd

Publication date 03 May 2017
Case reference 119573
Procedure Track 2
Adjudicated party DSLB Ltd
Tribunal's final assessment Very Serious
Sanctions Code 14 - 4.8.3 (g) Sanctions
Breaches raised Code 14 - 4.8.6 (b) Sanctions
Summary

A service provided by the Level 2 provider DSLB LTD (the “Level 2 provider”) was the subject of a Phone-paid Services Authority (“PSA”) investigation and adjudication (case reference: 79449), which resulted in sanctions being imposed by a Tribunal on 2 September 2016. The sanctions imposed by the Tribunal were a formal reprimand, a fine of £200,000, a requirement that the Level 2 provider remedy the breaches: by ensuring that it holds robust verification of each consumer’s consent to be charged before making any further charge to the consumer, including for existing subscribers to the Service and by ensuring that no consumers are charged after sending STOP to the Service shortcode(s); and a requirement that the Level 2 provider refund all consumers who claim a refund, for the full amount spent by them on the Service, within 28 days of their claim, save where there is good cause to believe that such claims are not valid, and provide evidence to the PSA that such refunds have been made. In addition, an administrative charge of £12,520.52 was imposed.

The Level 2 provider failed to pay the fine in the time period specified or at all.

The Executive raised the following potential breaches of the PSA Code of Practice  (14th Edition) (“the Code”)

* Paragraph 4.8.6(b) – Failure to comply with a sanction

The Tribunal upheld the breach of the Code raised.  The Tribunal considered the case to be very serious and imposed a prohibition on the Level 2 provider from providing, or having any involvement in, any premium rate service for a period of five years, starting from the date of publication of this decision, or until the breaches are remedied by payment of the outstanding fine and the original and instant administrative charges, whichever is the later.  

Administrative charge recommendation: 100%

Download adjudication decision