Xplosion Ltd
Publication date | 12 February 2019 |
---|---|
Case reference | 161122 |
Procedure | Track 2 |
Adjudicated party | Xplosion Ltd |
Service type | Competition and quizzes |
Tribunal's final assessment | Very Serious |
Sanctions |
Code 14 -
4.8.3 (b) Code 14 - 4.8.3 (g) Sanctions |
Breaches raised |
Code 14 -
4.11.2 Non-payment of administrative charge |
Summary | This case concerned alleged breaches of sanctions imposed by an earlier Tribunal (21 September 2018, case reference 111863) following an investigation into a weekly quiz competition service operating under the brand ‘QuizM8’ on PayForIt ("PFI") and shortcode 65065 (the "Service"). The Level 2 provider for the Service was Xplosion Limited (the "Level 2 provider"). The Level 2 provider registered with the Phone-paid Services Authority (the "PSA") on 27 January 2015 and its registration lapsed on 26 January 2018. The Level 2 provider currently remains de-registered on the PSA Registration Scheme. The Level 1 providers in respect of the Service were Dynamic Mobile Billing Limited ("DMB") and Dimoco Europe GmbH ("Dimoco"). The Executive received 68 complaints concerning the Service between 9 August 2016 and 20 March 2017. On 21 September 2018, the Tribunal upheld breaches of rule 2.3.3 (consent to charge), rule 2.2.1 (transparency and pricing), rule 2.3.1 (fair and equitable treatment), paragraph 4.2.3 (failure to disclose information), and paragraph 3.4.14 (a) (service registration). The overall assessment was that the case was very serious and the following sanctions were imposed on the Level 2 provider: The Tribunal also recommended payment of 100% of the administrative charge of £5,817.50. The Level 2 provider was notified informally of the Tribunal’s decision on 1 October 2018. On 4 October 2018 the Level 2 provider was issued with the full Tribunal written decision and fine and administrative charge invoices. At the date of this Tribunal hearing in relation to the alleged breaches of sanctions, the fine and administrative charge remained outstanding. Having regard to all the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal decided to impose the following sanctions: |
Download adjudication decision |